| Structure at the top of the tower at Quirigua |
Late last
night, I finally arrived in Guatemala after being delayed in Dallas for the
weekend. This morning, Stephen Smoot and I joined up with our tour group, and
from there went to Quiriguá, some Classic Maya ruins dating from approximately
the 5th–9th centuries AD. This, of course, means that it is post Book of
Mormon. Despite this, however, there is an interesting Latter-day Saint connection
to Quiriguá.
| The Site history at Quirigua, talking about John Lloyd Stephens |
Quiriguá
was one of the sites visited by explorer and author John Lloyd Stephens and
artist Fredrick Catherwood, and described in their 1841 volume Incidents of
Travel in Central American, Chiapas, and Yucatan, which caught the
attention of several early Latter-day Saints in Nauvoo, in 1842. Although some
are eager to distance the Prophet Joseph Smith from all this, he was almost
certainly among those who were fascinated by these findings. An editorial
which ran in the October
1, 1842 Times and Seasons, during
Joseph’s tenure as editor, suggested that Quiriguá was a Book of Mormon city.
We are not going to declare positively that the ruins of Quirigua are those of Zarahemla, but when the land and the stones, and the books tell the story so plain, we are of opinion, that it would require more proof than the Jews could bring to prove the disciples stole the body of Jesus from the tomb, to prove that the ruins of the city in question, are not one of those referred to in the Book of Mormon.
The
authorship of this and a handful of other editorials is disputed by some, but
the best
evidence points to Joseph
Smith as the author.
| A lakam-tuun, lit. large stone |
Of course,
at the time the actual dating of Quiriguá and other sites were not yet known.
Although we now know that Quiriguá is post-Book of Mormon, Matthew Roper has explained
why Joseph Smith and early Latter-day Saints might have seen a similarity
between the ruins discussed by Stephens and illustrated by Catherwood, and Book
of Mormon cities, Quiriguá and Zarahemla in particular.
| A lakam-tuun, from a side with Mayan hieroglyphs |
In particular,
the mention of “a large stone brought … with engravings on it” (Omni
1:20) found at Zarahemla caught the attention of the Times and Seasons editor.
It is certainly a good thing for the excellency and veracity, of the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon, that the ruins of Zarahemla have been found where the Nephites left them: and that a large stone with engravings upon it, as Mosiah said.
Such “large
stones,” or lakam-tuun (from Mayan, lit. large
stone) are of course found throughout Mesoamerican ruins. However, the tallest
are here, at Quiriguá.
| Me, next to one of the tallest lakam-tuun at Quirigua |
Despite
knowing it is not directly related to the Book of Mormon, it was fun seeing the
ruins of Quiriguá and standing next to the largest known lakam-tuun in all of Mesoamerica. The role it played in early LDS
thought—and very likely Joseph Smith’s own thinking about the Book of Mormon—makes
it a significant site for Latter-day Saints and the intellectual history of
Book of Mormon geography and archaeology.
Keep us posted. Totally jealous.
ReplyDelete